As Trump Demands More Military Spending, NATO Allies Reconsider What Counts

The president has long pressed European allies to pay more for their own security. So they may redefine what qualifies as security.According to The New York Times, the president has been urging European allies to increase their own contributions to their security for a long time. In response, these countries are considering redefining what qualifies as security in order to meet his demands. Initially, when President Trump called for NATO allies to spend 5 percent of their national income on defense, many European leaders believed it was impossible. However, they have now come up with a solution through creative accounting.

Some NATO countries have agreed to a new plan that expands the definition of NATO spending beyond traditional items like troops and weapons. The plan sets a target of 3.5 percent of their gross domestic product for military spending, with an additional 1.5 percent for nontraditional “defense-related” expenses by 2032. This could include investments in infrastructure, cybersecurity, and advanced technology for weaponry and communications. Some member nations are willing to take on a larger share of the collective costs, concerned by President Trump’s threats to reduce American support for European security if they do not comply.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated last week after a meeting with the alliance’s foreign ministers in Turkey that “we have to make sure that we have all the necessary resources in place for defense spending.” He also highlighted the importance of investing in infrastructure, using the example of bridges that may not be able to support military vehicles. The agreement to the 5 percent plan was made in Turkey, with Rutte stating that “sometimes when you cross a bridge in Europe, you hope with your own car that you safely get across it — let alone with a tank.”

Overall, European allies are taking steps to meet President Trump’s demands for increased defense spending, even if it means redefining what qualifies as security. This decision was made in response to the president’s threats to weaken American support for European security if they do not contribute more. 

Source:Read More

Leave a Reply